Key result
Uremic subjects on hemodialysis had significantly lower flow-mediated vasodilation (4.79% vs 7.19%) and higher skin autofluorescence compared to non-CKD controls, indicating endothelial dysfunction.
Why the study?
Is skin autofluorescence associated with endothelial dysfunction in uremic subjects on hemodialysis?
Case-Control (n=176)
Yes
Is skin autofluorescence associated with endothelial dysfunction in uremic subjects on hemodialysis?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.79% vs 7.19%
p-value: p=<0.01
Skin autofluorescence is an independent predictor of endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis patients, suggesting its utility as a non-invasive marker for early atherosclerosis.
Skin AF may noninvasively flag endothelial dysfunction in hemodialysis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) within tissues may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, an early indicator of atherosclerosis. We aimed to investigate whether levels of skin AGEs could be a useful marker to predict endothelial dysfunction in uremic subjects on hemodialysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen uremic patients on hemodialysis and 57 control subjects with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk factors and without chronic kidney disease (CKD) were enrolled. We used ultrasound to measure flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). An AGE reader measured skin autoflurorescence (AF). We then compared differences in FMD and skin AF values between the two groups. The uremic subjects had significantly higher levels of skin AF (3.47±0.76 AU vs. 2.21±0.45 arbitrary units; P<0.01) and significantly lower levels of FMD (4.79%±1.88% vs. 7.19%±2.17%; P<0.01) than the non-CKD subjects. After adjusting for all potential covariates, we found that skin AF level independently predicted FMD in both the hemodialysis and the non-CKD groups. In the hemodialysis group, skin AF ≥ 3.05 arbitrary units predicted abnormal FMD at a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 78.6% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Skin AF could be a useful marker to predict endothelial dysfunction in uremic subjects on hemodialysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Uremia on hemodialysis (n=176). Uremia on hemodialysis vs. Non-CKD with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (p=<0.01). Uremic subjects on hemodialysis had significantly lower flow-mediated vasodilation (4.79% vs 7.19%) and higher skin autofluorescence compared to non-CKD controls, indicating endothelial dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: