This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Previous studies on the role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in fever induced by intravenous LPS have failed to investigate the role of these isoenzymes in the earliest responses: monophasic fever (response to a low, near-threshold dose of LPS) and the first phase of polyphasic fever (response to higher doses). We studied these responses in 96 mice that were COX-1 or COX-2 deficient (-/-) or sufficient (+/+). Each mouse was implanted with a temperature telemetry probe into the peritoneal cavity and a jugular catheter. The study was conducted at a tightly controlled, neutral ambient temperature (31 degrees C). To avoid stress hyperthermia (which masks the onset of fever), all injections were performed through a catheter extension. The +/+ mice responded to intravenous saline with no change in deep body temperature. To a low dose of LPS (1 microg/kg iv), they responded with a monophasic fever. To a higher dose (56 microg/kg), they responded with a polyphasic fever. Neither monophasic fever nor the first phase of polyphasic fever was attenuated in the COX-1 -/- mice, but both responses were absent in the COX-2 -/- mice. The second and third phases of polyphasic fever were also missing in the COX-2 -/- mice. The present study identifies a new, critical role for COX-2 in the mediation of the earliest responses to intravenous LPS: monophasic fever and the first phase of polyphasic fever. It also suggests that no product of the COX-1 gene, including the splice variant COX-1b (COX-3), is essential for these responses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steiner et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: