Key result
Omapatrilat reduces blood pressure and albuminuria vs. control, lowering systolic BP more than irbesartan.
Why the study?
Hypertension is the main risk factor for progression of kidney damage in diabetes mellitus, and the comparative effects of irbesartan and omapatrilat on renal damage in this context were evaluated.
Does irbesartan or omapatrilat reduce the progression of kidney damage in an experimental model of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hypertension?
Does irbesartan or omapatrilat reduce the progression of kidney damage in an experimental model of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an experimental model of diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, omapatrilat afforded greater long-term renoprotection than irbesartan, primarily due to its potent effect in reducing systolic blood pressure.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the main risk factor for the progression of kidney damage in diabetes mellitus. The aim of the present work is to compare the effect of the treatment with irbesartan (IRBE) and omapatrilat (OMA), in obese Zucker rats (OZR). METHODS: A group of 45 OZR were uninephrectomized to accelerate renal damage, and divided into three groups: two experimental groups (IRBE and OMA) treated with 50 and 40 mg/kg/d, respectively; and the control group (CG). At the end of the 8-month follow-up period, animals were killed and the remnant kidney was removed for histologic study and to evaluate the transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) expression. RESULTS: Both therapies reduced blood pressure (BP) versus CG (P <.001). Moreover, systolic BP was significantly lower in the OMA group than in the IRBE group (P <.001). Also, both treatments significantly lowered the urinary albumin excretion (P <.001). The OMA treatment exhibited lower values than the IRBE treatment (P <.05). The kidney TGF-beta1 expression was reduced by both treatments to a similar level. The correlation between systolic BP and glomerulosclerosis (GS) is very high (r = 0.90; P <.0001). Also, a high correlation was observed between GS and proteinuria (r = 0.79, P <.0001). The correlation between systolic BP and proteinuria was weaker (r = 0.69; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both therapies are effective in ameliorating the progression of renal damage in this experimental model. Omapatrilat affords greater long-term renoprotection than irbesartan, mainly due to its potent effect in reducing systolic BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O. González-Albarrán (2003) studied Type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension (experimental model) (n=45). Omapatrilat and Irbesartan vs. Control group was evaluated on Blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion (p=<.001). Both omapatrilat and irbesartan significantly reduced blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion compared to control (P<.001), with omapatrilat providing greater systolic BP reduction (P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: