Key result
Muslim affiliation is linked to ~60% higher ACS risk compared with Christian affiliation.
Why the study?
The association of religious affiliation (Muslim versus Christian) with acute coronary syndrome in Albania was not previously assessed.
Is Muslim religious affiliation associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to Christian affiliation in Albania?
Case-Control (n=1,204)
No
Is Muslim religious affiliation associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to Christian affiliation in Albania?
In a population-based case-control study in Albania, Muslim religious affiliation was associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to Christian affiliation, independent of socioeconomic and conventional risk factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform culturally sensitive ACS prevention in Albania; leaves open causality and generalizability beyond this case-control study.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the association of religious affiliation (Muslim versus Christian) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Albania, a predominantly Muslim country in Southeast Europe. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was conducted in Tirana, the Albanian capital, in 2003-2006. Of non-fatal consecutive ACS patients, 467 were recruited (370 men aged 59.1 +/- 8.7 years and 97 women 63.3 +/- 7.1 years, 88% response). The coronary heart disease-free control group comprised 469 men (53.1 +/- 10.4 years) and 268 women (54.0 +/- 10.9 years) (69% response), 452 and 237 of whom were fully examined. Information collected included sociodemographic, psychosocial and behavioural characteristics by structured interview and anthropometric measurements. Furthermore, data on religious affiliation was available for all but 20 of the non-respondents. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to assess the association of religious affiliation (Muslim versus Christian) with ACS. RESULTS: Of ACS patients, 77.1% were Muslims compared with 65.8% of the entire control group. Muslims in both sexes were at higher risk of ACS than Christians (age- and sex-adjusted OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.4-2.3, P < 0.01). The association persisted (OR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.1-2.3, P = 0.02) upon further adjustment for marital status, family size, education, income, employment status, social position, emigration of close relatives, financial loss and coronary risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In this transitional country, we found a higher risk of ACS in Muslims than Christians, independent of the socioeconomic circumstances and conventional coronary risk factors assessed. This finding requires replication and the determinants of the excess risk sought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burazeri et al. (2008) conducted a case-control in Acute coronary syndrome (n=1,204). Muslim religious affiliation vs. Christian religious affiliation was evaluated on Acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3, p=0.02). Muslim religious affiliation was associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome compared to Christian affiliation (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.3; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: