Key result
The duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay demonstrated a detection limit of 4.75 copies/µL compared to 76 copies/µL for qPCR, providing a 16-fold improvement in sensitivity for PRV detection.
Why the study?
Does duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) improve the detection sensitivity of pseudorabies virus compared to TaqMan real-time PCR (qPCR)?
Does duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) improve the detection sensitivity of pseudorabies virus compared to TaqMan real-time PCR (qPCR)?
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aujeszky's disease, caused by pseudorabies virus (PRV), has damaged the economy of the Chinese swine industry. A large number of PRV gene-deleted vaccines have been constructed based on deletion of the glycoprotein E ( gE) gene combined with other virulence-related gene deletions, such as thymidine kinase ( TK), whereas PRV wild-type strains contain an intact gE gene. We developed a sensitive duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay to rapidly detect PRV wild-type isolates and gE gene-deleted viral vaccines. We compared this assay with a TaqMan real-time PCR (qPCR) using the same primers and probes. Both assays exhibited good linearity and repeatability; however, ddPCR maintained linearity at extremely low concentrations, whereas qPCR did not. Based on positive results for both gE and gB, the detection limit of ddPCR was found to be 4.75 copies/µL in contrast of 76 copies/µL for qPCR, showing that ddPCR provided a 16-fold improvement in sensitivity. In addition, no nonspecific amplification was shown in specificity testing, and the PRV wild-type was distinguished from a gE-deleted strain. The ddPCR was more sensitive when analyzing clinical serum samples. Thus, ddPCR may become an appropriate detection platform for PRV.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Duplex droplet digital PCR provides a highly sensitive and specific platform for detecting and distinguishing wild-type pseudorabies virus from gene-deleted vaccine strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2017) studied Aujeszky's disease (pseudorabies virus). Duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay vs. TaqMan real-time PCR (qPCR) was evaluated on Detection limit (16-fold improvement). The duplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay demonstrated a detection limit of 4.75 copies/µL compared to 76 copies/µL for qPCR, providing a 16-fold improvement in sensitivity for PRV detection.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: