Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Function-Behavior-Structure model (FBS) of design conceptualizes objects in terms of function, behavior, and structure. It has been widely utilized as a foundation for modelling the design process that transforms posited functions to a description of behaviors. Nevertheless, the FBS model is still regarded as a subjective and experience-based process and it provides no theory about how a function is transformed into behavior. Research has shown that the critical concepts of function and behavior have many different definitions. This paper suggests a viable alternative and contrasts it with the FBS framework of design using published study cases. The results point to several benefits gained by adopting the proposed method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabah Al‐Fedaghi (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: