Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: The aim was to study the sealing efficacy of polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealers were reviewed and subjected to an ex vivo study. A total of 60 extracted maxillary incisors were included in this study, which was conducted under two groups, Groups A and B, of 30 teeth each. In Group A, GuttaFlow and in Group B, RoekoSeal as sealers were used for obturation with Gutta-percha cones after preparing canal with a step back technique. The criterion for evaluating sealing efficacy of the sealers was light absorption by spectrophotometer. The collected data were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA test. RESULTS: The findings of the study revealed that the mean leakage in Group B (0.1027) was significantly less than Group A (0.1649) (P < 0.001). RoekoSeal showed superior sealing ability. CONCLUSION: RoekoSeal had the better sealing ability than GuttaFlow and may be recommended for clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: