Key result
Higher defibrillation threshold after non-terminating AF ablation is linked to over fivefold greater recurrence risk.
Why the study?
The impact of atrial defibrillation threshold after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation on clinical outcome was not well established.
Does atrial defibrillation threshold predict recurrent arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=128)
Does atrial defibrillation threshold predict recurrent arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A high defibrillation threshold (>10 J) for internal cardioversion after unsuccessful catheter ablation for persistent AF strongly predicts arrhythmia recurrence.
AIMS: Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently performed with different procedural endpoints. When AF did not terminate during ablation procedure, electrical cardioversion was performed at different defibrillation threshold (DFT) according to AF characteristics and atrial electrophysiologic substrates. We sought to evaluate the impact of atrial DFT after catheter ablation for persistent AF on clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 128 patients with persistent AF (age 63±9 years, 106 men). After completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, the left atrial substrate ablation was performed until AF terminated or all identified complex fractionated electrograms were eliminated. If AF did not terminate during ablation, an internal cardioversion protocol was started at 5J and was increased incrementally in 5 J steps until successful cardioversion was accomplished. Procedural AF termination was achieved in 50 patients (Group A). Atrial fibrillation was terminated by cardioversion with DFT≤10 J in 47 patients (Group B) and with DFT>10 J in 31 patients (Group C). At 14±7 follow-up months after 1.3±0.5 sessions, 47 (94%) Group A patients, 42 (89%) Group B patients, and 14 (45%) Group C patients remained in sinus rhythm. In multivariate analysis of Group B and Group C, DFT (hazard ratio 5.54, P<0.001) and AF duration (hazard ratio 3.74, P=0.011) were independent predictors of recurrent arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: When AF does not terminate after the completion of predetermined stepwise ablation, further extensive ablation to terminate AF might be unnecessary if the AF can be successfully terminated by electrical cardioversion at low DFT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komatsu et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=128). Defibrillation threshold >10 J vs. Defibrillation threshold ≤10 J was evaluated on Recurrent arrhythmia (HR 5.54, p=<0.001). In patients whose persistent atrial fibrillation did not terminate during ablation, a higher defibrillation threshold independently predicted recurrent arrhythmia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: