Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2008Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis

Comparison of optical and mechanical clot detection for routine coagulation testing in a large volume clinical laboratory

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BBBing BaiRutgers, The State University of New JerseyDCDouglas J. ChristieAlbury Wodonga HealthRGRobert T Gorman

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Bai et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab70fc54858220f2d62d916https://doi.org/10.1097/mbc.0b013e3283070872
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Two Automated Coagulometers and the Manual Tilt-Tube Method for the Determination of Prothrombin Time1989 · 60 citations
  2. 2Fibrinogen longmont: A dysfibrinogenemia that causes prolonged clot‐based test results only when using an optical detection method2000 · 33 citations