Key result
Coronary sinus leads linked to ~5-fold higher first-shock success for AF in atrial ICDs.
Why the study?
The determinants of first-shock success for defibrillation of spontaneous atrial fibrillation in ambulatory patients with atrial ICDs are unknown.
Observational (n=50)
In patients with atrial ICDs, first-shock success for spontaneous AF is driven by coronary sinus electrode use and absence of Class III antiarrhythmics or early AF recurrence, rather than stronger shocks or early cardioversion.
Reducing ERAF may enhance persistent sinus rhythm after atrial ICD shocks; this cohort analysis leaves open optimal device programming for prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to identify determinants of first-shock success for defibrillation of spontaneous atrial fibrillation (AF) in ambulatory patients with an atrial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The determinants of first-shock success in ambulatory patients with atrial ICDs are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the generalized estimating equation method to analyze determinants of first-shock success in 50 consecutive atrial ICD recipients in whom DFT+ (weakest shock that defibrillates on two consecutive trials) was determined at implant and spontaneous AF was shocked with shock strength > or = 2 x DFT+. DFT+ was 6.2 +/- 3.1 J. Of 470 first shocks, 407 were successful (generalized estimating equation 85%, confidence interval 79% to 90%). Determinants of first-shock success were use of coronary sinus electrode (univariate P = 0.02; multivariate P < 0.001, relative risk 5.0), absence of a Class III antiarrhythmic drug (univariate P = 0.06; multivariate P < 0.001, relative risk 3.2), absence of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF; univariate P = 0.06; multivariate P = 0.02, relative risk 2.9), and longer duration of AF prior to shock > or = 3 hours (univariate: P = 0.02; multivariate P = NS). Sinus rhythm >1 minute persisted after 93% of first shocks in patients without documented ERAF but after only 58% of shocks in patients with documented ERAF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reducing ERAF is critical to achieving a clinically acceptable rate of persistent sinus rhythm after first shocks. For first shocks > or = 2 x DFT +, success is not increased by programming stronger shocks. Early cardioversion does not increase first-shock success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swerdlow et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Spontaneous atrial fibrillation in ambulatory patients with an atrial ICD (n=50). Clinical and device determinants (e.g., coronary sinus electrode, antiarrhythmic drugs) was evaluated on First-shock success for defibrillation of spontaneous AF. First-shock success for spontaneous AF in atrial ICD recipients was 85%, significantly predicted by use of a coronary sinus electrode (RR 5.0), absence of Class III drugs (RR 3.2), and absence of ERAF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: