Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study is to compare the artefacts ascribed to the technique of incisional biopsy using a punch or scalpel and the influence of suture use for traction and delivery of the specimen. A total of 160 samples were obtained from 10 fresh pig tongues by four experienced oral surgeons. Handling artefacts (squeeze artefacts): crush, splits, fragmentation and pseudocysts were assessed. No differences were identified in terms of crush, fragmentation or pseudocysts between samples obtained with a punch or scalpel. Splits were more frequent in those biopsies taken with a scalpel (chi2 = 9.26; P= 0.0023). Artefacts in the punch biopsy group were significantly less than in the group that combined punch and suture traction (P < 0.01). The scalpel and suture traction group showed significantly more artefacts than the group without suture. It is concluded the use of a stitch for traction in small incisional biopsies causes squeeze artefacts, so its use should be restricted to specimen orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varela‐Centelles et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: