Key result
Good sleep quality linked to ~11 mmHg SBP drop after concurrent training in severe obesity.
Why the study?
The role of sleep quality in adaptations to concurrent training for metabolic syndrome and health-related quality of life markers in morbidly obese patients is not well understood.
Does poor sleep quality decrease the benefits of a 20-week concurrent training program on metabolic syndrome and quality of life markers in morbidly obese patients?
Cohort (n=29)
No
Does poor sleep quality decrease the benefits of a 20-week concurrent training program on metabolic syndrome and quality of life markers in morbidly obese patients?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.82
Absolute Event Rate: 125.6% vs 137%
p-value: p=0.006
Poor sleep quality attenuates the beneficial effects of a 20-week concurrent training program on metabolic syndrome markers and quality of life in morbidly obese patients.
Background: Sleep quality (SQ) plays a role in multiple activities of daily living, but little is known about its role in concurrent training [CT, high-intensity interval (HIIT) plus resistance training (RT)] adaptations for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) markers. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of a 20-week CT programme on MetS and HRQoL markers according to the SQ of morbidly obese patients. Methods: Twenty-nine morbidly obese patients were allocated to one of two groups: good sleep quality (GSQ, n = 15, 38.07 ± 12.26 years) and poor sleep quality (PSQ, n = 14, 40.79 ± 11.62 years). HRQoL, body mass index, waist circumference (WC), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), and plasma outcomes were measured. Results: The GSQ group reported significant changes (pre- vs. post-intervention) in WC (114.0 ± 3.1 vs. 110.4 ± 3.4 cm, p = 0.012), SBP (137.0 ± 4.3 vs. 125.6 ± 1.8 mmHg, p = 0.006), and HRQoL general health (51.33 ± 21.08 vs. 64.33 ± 16.24, p = 0.020). By contrast, the PSQ group showed significant changes only in SQ (9.00 ± 2.42 vs. 5.36 ± 2.84, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Morbidly obese PSQ patients showed a lower response for improving MetS and HRQoL markers after a 20-week CT programme than GSQ peers. However, there was a greater effect size for decreasing WC and SBP in favour of the GSQ compared with the PSQ group, suggesting that there are limitations to CT benefits on these outcomes in the PSQ group. These results call for more complex future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delgado‐Floody et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity (n=29). Concurrent training (CT) program vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) in good sleep quality group (ES 0.82, p=0.006). A 20-week concurrent training program significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (ES 0.82) and waist circumference in morbidly obese patients with good sleep quality, whereas those with poor sleep quality showed no significant improvements in these metabolic markers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: