Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The symmetrical bisferrocene 1,1,14,14-tetra- n- butyl-2,2,13,13,15,15,26,26-octamethyl-1,2,13,14,15,26-hexastanna[3.3]ferrocenophane ([(η 5 -C 5 H 4 )Fe(η 5 -C 5 H 4 SnMe 2 Sn( n -Bu) 2 SnMe 2 )] 2, 8 ) was synthesized in good yield (82%) from the reductive coupling reaction of 1,1′-bis(dimethylstannyl)ferrocene, 6, with one equivalent of di- n -butylbis(diethylamino) stannane, 7a, at 0 °C in diethyl ether solution. Compound 8 is stable to ambient light but decomposes in the presence of moisture or chlorinated solvents. The title compound 8 was characterized by NMR ( 1 H, 13 C, 117 Sn, 119 Sn) spectroscopy, HRMS, and elemental analysis. A statistical model to account for the 117 Sn/ 119 Sn coupling patterns, observed in both the 117 Sn and 119 Sn NMR spectra, was undertaken and is a good fit to experimental data. Investigations by UV–vis spectroscopy display a visible d–d transition at λ max at 455 nm (ε = 74 L mol –1 cm –1 ), while cyclic voltammetry reveals two reversible oxidation events at 0.01 and 0.23 V (relative to the ferrocene/ferrocenium couple), indicative of strong electronic communication between the ferrocene units. A DFT analysis of compound 8 supports the symmetrical nature of the molecule with a calculated intramolecular distance of ≃8.5 Å between iron centers. This is the first example of a [3.3]ferrocenophane bearing three σ-conjugated group 14 spacers between the ferrocene units. Furthermore, an improved route to 1,1,2,2-tetramethyldistannanediyl[2]ferrocenophane 4a has been found, through an intermolecular dehydrogenative coupling of 6 with catalytic amounts of Pd 2 (dba) 3, that leads to superior yields of 4a over previously published protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: