Key result
ViV TAVI with ACURATE neo2 achieves ~98% technical success with no mid-term mortality.
Why the study?
Valve-in-valve TAVI is a key treatment for degenerated surgical bioprosthetic valves, and the ACURATE neo2 valve offers advanced features addressing ViV TAVI challenges.
Does Valve-in-valve TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 valve improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with symptomatic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction?
Cohort (n=55)
No
Does Valve-in-valve TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 valve improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with symptomatic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ACURATE neo2 valve demonstrates high technical success, safety, and excellent short-to-mid-term hemodynamic and clinical outcomes when used for valve-in-valve TAVI in degenerated surgical bioprostheses.
Background/Objectives: Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a key approach for treating degenerated surgical bioprosthetic valves. The ACURATE neo2 valve, with its advanced sealing technology and optimized coronary access, represents a promising solution for the challenges of ViV TAVI. This study evaluates the procedural and short-to-mid-term outcomes of the ACURATE neo2 valve in ViV TAVI. Methods: This single-center, single-operator prospective study included patients with symptomatic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, classified in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, who underwent ViV TAVI with ACURATE neo2 at our center between July 2022 and February 2024. Outcomes were assessed using VARC-3 criteria. Results: Fifty-five patients (51% females, median (IQR) age 76 (8) years) were included. The technical success rate was 98.2%. No patients experienced in-hospital mortality, stroke, MI, bleeding, vascular complications, renal failure, or new pacemaker implantation. Three patients (5.5%) underwent elective chimney stenting for coronary protection. The post-procedural mean aortic gradient was 6.7 ± 1 mmHg, with a mean aortic valve area (AVA) of 2.0 ± 0.1 cm². Over a median follow-up period of 1.2 years, no deaths (0%) were observed, heart failure hospitalization rate was 3.6%, and NYHA class improved to ≤ II in 100% of patients. Conclusions: ACURATE neo2 demonstrated excellent technical success, sustained hemodynamic performance, and significant clinical improvement in ViV TAVI. The absence of major adverse events reinforces its safety, efficacy, and durability as a treatment for degenerated surgical bioprostheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadopoulos et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (n=55). ACURATE neo2 valve (Valve-in-Valve TAVI) was evaluated on Technical success (VARC-3 criteria). Valve-in-valve TAVI using the ACURATE neo2 valve achieved a 98.2% technical success rate with 0% mortality and no major adverse events over a median follow-up of 1.2 years.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: