Key result
Protruding interventricular septum may impede helix-fixed leadless pacemaker placement, requiring conversion to a tine-fixed system.
Why the study?
The helix-fixed leadless pacemaker has advantages but its longer body and catheter curvature may be affected by anatomical factors during implantation, impacting success.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anatomical factors such as a protruding interventricular septum should be considered when selecting between helix-fixed and tine-fixed leadless pacemakers.
The leadless pacemaker (LPM) system has widespread use as the first line therapy for bradyarrhythmia.1,2,3 The two types of LPMs: helix-fixed (AVEIR™; Abbott, CA, USA) and tine-fixed (MicraTM, Medtronic, MN, USA) have their specific advantage and disadvantage. The helix-fixed LPM is superior to tine-fixed LPM in terms of the battery longevity, pretest before screw-in fixation, retrievability, and the dual-chamber (DDD)-LPMs option.4 However, its longer body and delivery catheter curvature might be susceptible to anatomical factors during implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oka et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Bradyarrhythmia requiring leadless pacemaker (n=1). Conversion from helix-fixed to tine-fixed leadless pacemaker was evaluated. A protruding interventricular septum may impact the success of helix-fixed leadless pacemaker implantation, necessitating conversion to a tine-fixed system.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: