Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an educational intervention that includes information sharing about absolute fracture risk on the knowledge of osteoporosis and modifiable risk factors among Korean patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: Adults aged >50 years who visited the outpatient clinic for osteoporosis were recruited. Subjects with trauma-related fractures or pathological fractures were excluded. The anthropometric data and clinical risk factors for fracture were collected at baseline. The participants completed the survey questionnaire that measured their knowledge regarding osteoporosis at baseline and then received information about the risk of fracture and individual education. Fracture risk was classified into five groups according to degree. The post-survey was conducted 3 months later. The pretest results were compared with the posttest results. When comparing the pre- and post-education Korean fracture risk scores, a negligible difference was found between the "very low risk" and "low risk" groups. However, the scores in the "very high risk" and "high risk" groups decreased from 77.6% to 76.0%. We found a difference over time only in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Simple educational intervention is effective in increasing osteoporosis knowledge among Korean patients with osteoporosis. It may confer some benefit by providing information about osteoporotic fracture risks to improve knowledge and awareness regarding osteoporosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jo et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: