Key result
Admission cardiac index predicts non-cardiac ICU mortality with ~86% diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
The usefulness of cardiac index measured non-invasively to predict early and 30-day mortality in non-cardiac ICU patients was not established.
Does cardiac index measured by two-dimensional echocardiography predict early and 30-day mortality in non-cardiac patients admitted to intensive care units?
Cohort (n=31)
No
Does cardiac index measured by two-dimensional echocardiography predict early and 30-day mortality in non-cardiac patients admitted to intensive care units?
Non-invasive measurement of cardiac index via echocardiography on ICU admission is a strong predictor of mortality in non-cardiac patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiac index may aid mortality risk stratification in non-cardiac ICU patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction: Cardiac index is a hemodynamic parameter defined as the ratio of the cardiac output, i.e., the volume of blood ejected from the left ventricle in 1 min, to the body surface area. This study aimed to assess the cardiac index to predict early and 30-day outcomes of non-cardiac patients being admitted to intensive care units using a non-invasive approach. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study included 31 non-cardiac patients who were consecutively admitted to the intensive care units of Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran, in 2016. On admission, the simplified acute physiology score II to predict mortality and the cardiac output (by two-dimensional echocardiography) of each patient were determined. The cardiac index was calculated by dividing the cardiac output by the body surface area. In-hospital mortality and complications were assessed, and the association between simplified acute physiology score II and cardiac index was determined. The patients were followed-up 30 days after discharge by telephone to determine late death, occurrence of myocardial infarction, readmission, or re-hospitalization. Results: The mean cardiac index was significantly lower among the patients who died in intensive care units than in those who survived (2.86 ± 0.63 versus 3.70 ± 0.49, p = 0.006). A significant inverse association was found between Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and cardiac index (r = −0.539, p = 0.002). The length of hospital and intensive care units stay was not associated with Simplified Acute Physiology Score -II or cardiac index. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the cardiac index was effective in predicting in intensive care units mortality (area under curve = 0.857, p = 0.007). The best cut-off value for the cardiac index to predict in intensive care units mortality was 3.35, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 80.0%. Conclusion: Measuring the cardiac index during intensive care units admission using a noninvasive approach even in non-cardiac patients can predict in intensive care units mortality with high sensitivity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moradians et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Non-cardiac patients admitted to intensive care units (n=31). Cardiac index was evaluated on Intensive care unit mortality (AUC 0.857, p=0.007). Measuring cardiac index on admission predicted intensive care unit mortality in non-cardiac patients, with a cutoff of 3.35 providing 83.3% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: