Key result
Left atrial size over 40 mm is linked to nearly triple the rate of AF.
Why the study?
The relation between echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease was not well studied.
Is left atrial size associated with atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
No
Is left atrial size associated with atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 69.05% vs 25%
p-value: p=<0.02
Left atrial dimension >40 mm is significantly associated with the presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.
May inform AF risk stratification in rheumatic mitral valve disease; extends cross-sectional associations but leaves causality and intervention effects open.
BACKGROUNDAtrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disturbance, commonly occurs with rheumatic heart disease, particularly mitral stenosis.Hemodynamic impairment and thromboembolic events result in significant morbidity& mortality.Left atrial (LA) enlargement is one of the elements that evolve in the natural history of mitral stenosis.The objective of this study is to study the relation between echo cardio graphically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease (MVD). METHODOLOGY50 Patients with rheumatic heart disease with mitral valve disease were studied using ECG and ECHO, excluding patients with congenital heart diseases, non-rheumatic mitral valve disease, essential hypertension, patients undergone PTMC or valvuloplasty or valve replacement, coronary artery diseases, patients on antiarrhythmic drugs, pregnant women.Left atrial dimensions measured by ECHO in patients of MVD and AF on ECG were compared with the left atrial dimension of patients in sinus rhythm. RESULTSIn this study 42 patients had left atrial size >40 mm, 29(93.55%) of them were in atrial fibrillation and only 13(68.42%) were in sinus rhythm.Among 8 patients with left atrial size <40 mm, 2(6.45%) were in atrial fibrillation and 06(31.58%)were in sinus rhythm with p<0.02 which is significant. CONCLUSIONAtrial fibrillation incidence was common when left atrial dimension was above 40 mm.There is a quantitative relation between left atrial size measured echocardiographically and the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation.These results may have therapeutic implication in that it may be possible with echocardiography, to identify patients in sinus rhythm, who are at high risk of developing atrial fibrillation.Prophylactic anticoagulation, antiarrhythmic therapy or both might be considered in management to prevent embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mariyamballi et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Rheumatic heart disease with mitral valve disease (n=50). Left atrial size >40 mm vs. Left atrial size <40 mm was evaluated on Presence of atrial fibrillation (p=<0.02). Left atrial size greater than 40 mm was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (69.05% vs 25.0%) in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease (p<0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: