Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photophysical and electron transfer properties of the following Ru(II) complexes have been characterized: Ru(bpy)3‐n (biq)2+n, Ru(bpy)2(Cl2‐bpy)2+, Ru(Cl2‐bpy)2+3, Ru(bpy)2(NO2‐bpy)2+, Ru(NO2‐bpy)2+3, Ru(bpy)2(opdi)2+, Ru(bpy)2(phedi)2+, where n = 1 to 3, bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, biq = 2,2′‐biquinoline, and opdi and phedi are o‐quinodiimine ligands. The properties of these and other Ru‐polypyridine type photosensitizers are discussed on the basis of the requirements needed to split water with solar energy in an efficient way. It is shown that the Ru(bpy)2(LL)2+ complexes, where LL is a polypyridine‐type ligand which is easier to reduce than bpy, are expected to be more efficient photosensitizers than Ru(bpy)2+3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juris et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: