Key result
White-coat hypertension is linked to ~5-fold higher macroalbuminuria risk in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The impact of white-coat hypertension on microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes was not well defined.
Is white-coat hypertension associated with an increased risk of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=163)
Is white-coat hypertension associated with an increased risk of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes?
White-coat hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with a significantly increased risk of macroalbuminuria compared to normotension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May indicate need for closer albuminuria surveillance in type 2 diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE — The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of white-coat hypertension (WCH) on microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — A cross-sectional study was conducted in normotensive patients and patients with WCH selected from a cohort of 319 type 2 diabetic patients. Normotension was defined by office blood pressure �140/90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure �135/85 mmHg on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). WCH was defined as office blood pressure �140/90 mmHg and daytime blood pressure �135/85 mmHg on ABPM. Subjects were evaluated for diabetic nephropathy (24-h urinary albumin excretion rate) and diabetic retinopathy (classified according to the Global Diabetic Retinopathy Group). RESULTS — Forty-six type 2 diabetic patients had WCH (14.4%; mean age 56.6 years; 45.3% men) and 117 had normotension (36.6%; mean age 55.8 years; 37.5 % men). These groups did not differ in clinical and main laboratory characteristics. Systolic ABPM (24-h: 124.7 � 6.7 vs. 121.0 � 8.5 mmHg, P � 0.01 and daytime: 126.6 � 7.2 vs. 123.2 � 8.2 mmHg, P � 0.01) and blood pressure loads were higher in subjects with WCH than in the normotensive subjects. WCH was associated with an increased risk for macroalbuminuria (odds ratio 4.9 [95 % CI 1.3–18.7],
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kramer et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=163). White-coat hypertension vs. Normotension was evaluated on Macroalbuminuria (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.3-18.7). In patients with type 2 diabetes, white-coat hypertension was associated with an increased risk for macroalbuminuria compared to normotension (OR 4.9; 95% CI 1.3-18.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: