Key result
White-coat hypertension was associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic heart disease (RR 9.58; 95% CI 1.23-74.16; P=0.008).
Why the study?
To investigate the adverse effects of white-coat hypertension compared with hypertensive and normotensive patients, given accumulating evidence linking it to several risks and complications.
Is white-coat hypertension associated with increased risk of cardiac and noncardiac complications compared to normotension and sustained hypertension?
Cohort (n=286)
Is white-coat hypertension associated with increased risk of cardiac and noncardiac complications compared to normotension and sustained hypertension?
Relative Risk: 9.58 (95% CI 1.23–74.16)
p-value: p=0.008
White-coat hypertension is associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic heart disease and higher blood pressure variability, suggesting it should be managed similarly to sustained hypertension.
Background: Accumulating evidence demonstrates that white-coat hypertension (WCH) are associated with several risks and complications. In this study, we aimed to investigate the adverse effects of WCH compared with hypertensive and normotensive patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over five years. Blood pressure (BP) data was collected from both clinic visits and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) reports. Epidemiological data and complications, cardiac and noncardiac, were also recorded. Results: In total, 286 participants who were followed up for at least three years were included. The sample was divided into 99 normotensive patients (as a control group), 94 patients with clinically diagnosed hypertension (HTN), and 93 patients with WCH. Ischemic heart disease (IHD) was the most noted complication in the WCH group with a relative risk of 9.58 (1.23–74.16) ( P = 0.008). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was significantly correlated with a relative risk of 2.06 (0.52–13.38). No significant correlation was noted with noncardiac complications. Both HTN and WCH groups showed a significant association with blood pressure variability (BPV). WCH was associated with an increased BPV in ambulatory daytime systolic measurements ( P = 0.031) and a unique increase in diastolic measurement variability in office BP measurements ( P = 0.020). Conclusion: WCH should be managed as HTN. WCH is associated with cardiac complications, particularly IHD, specifically in patients 55 years and older. WCH was significantly associated with a higher BPV in both ABPM and office-based measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taher et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in White-coat hypertension (n=286). White-coat hypertension vs. Normotensive and hypertensive patients was evaluated on Ischemic heart disease (IHD) (RR 9.58, 95% CI 1.23-74.16, p=0.008). White-coat hypertension was associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic heart disease (RR 9.58; 95% CI 1.23-74.16; P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: