Key result
Demand pacemakers permit transient idiocardiac rhythm in ~79% of complete heart-block cases without competition.
Why the study?
Problems inherent in fixed-rate artificial cardiac pacemakers motivated the use of an implantable demand pacemaker in patients with bradyarrhythmias.
Does an implantable demand pacemaker safely manage bradyarrhythmias without causing competition during transient return of intrinsic rhythms?
Observational (n=17)
Does an implantable demand pacemaker safely manage bradyarrhythmias without causing competition during transient return of intrinsic rhythms?
Early evidence demonstrating that demand pacemakers can safely manage bradyarrhythmias while avoiding competition during transient return of intrinsic cardiac rhythms.
Demand pacing may address fixed-rate limitations in symptomatic heart block; leaves open long-term safety and efficacy pending controlled data.
An attempt was made to circumvent problems inherent in fixed-rate artificial cardiac pacemakers by utilizing an implantable demand pacemaker in 17 patients. Complete heart-block was present in 14, and 3 had other bradyarrhythmias. The cause was idiopathic in eight (mean age, 78.6 years), and was ischemic heart disease in nine (mean age, 67.7 years). All had Adams-Stokes attacks; ten had heart failure. Following implantation, 11 of 14 patients with complete heart-block exhibited transient return of idiocardiac rhythm, but competition did not occur. Two patients died; one of previous septicemia, and one death was unexplained. Six nonlethal complications included catheter displacement, threshold elevation, partial sensing failure, and postoperative hematoma. The frequent return of intrinsic cardiac rhythms and the occasional need for pacing in patients without complete heart-block emphasize the advantages of the demand pacemaker system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chawla Np (1969) conducted an observational in Bradyarrhythmias (n=17). Implantable demand pacemaker was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: