Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The amount of bisulfite (HSO3−, hydrated SO2) needed in beer to extend flavor stability is controversial with results that show elevated HSO3− levels in beer improves beer shelf-life analytically, yet decreases sensory flavor and flavor stability. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) beer methods, using the N-tert-Butyl-α-phenylnitrone (PBN) spin trap, can detect the hydroxyl and ethoxy radicals from ethanol (•OH/CH3C•HOH). Water soluble 5, 5-Dimethyl-1-Pyrroline-N-Oxide (DMPO) trapped bisulfite (•SO3-) and uncharacterized C-centered radicals in vastly different dry-hopped (DH) and non-dry-hopped (NDH-a and NDH-b) beers and can also trap radicals of nitrogen and oxygen. A new DMPO capillary tube method detected •SO3- and C-centered radicals in cold stored and forced aged DH and NDH beers, dosed with 3 mM and 5 mM of sodium sulfite (Na2SO3), and displayed substantially higher •SO3- radical signals from the 5 mM versus 3 mM Na2SO3 dosage. The lowest SO2 DH beer had greater polyphenols (antioxidants) and significantly less •SO3- radical activity than the lower polyphenols NDH beers, indicating higher polyphenols in the DH beer quench more •SO3- and uncharacterized C-centered radicals by way of H2O2 reduction. Increasing polyphenols and reducing beer SO2 levels can potentially improve beer flavor stability and reduce bisulfite allergies in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foster et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: