Key result
Carvedilol shows no benefit over atenolol for LVEF or serious cardiovascular events post-MI.
Why the study?
It is not fully understood whether all beta-blockers have similar favourable cardiovascular effects after myocardial infarction.
Does carvedilol improve global and regional LVEF compared to atenolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=232)
open, endpoint-blinded
randomized
No
Does carvedilol improve global and regional LVEF compared to atenolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Relative Risk: 0.83 (95% CI 0.56–1.23)
p-value: p=0.39
In patients with acute myocardial infarction, carvedilol and atenolol showed no significant difference in their effects on global or regional LVEF at 12 months.
Equivalent effects of carvedilol and atenolol on LVEF and events post-AMI; supports either agent and challenges carvedilol preference.
BACKGROUND: beta-Blockers have been found to reduce mortality and morbidity in postmyocardial infarction patients. However, it is not fully understood whether all beta-blockers have similar favourable cardiovascular effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of carvedilol and atenolol on global and regional left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and on predefined cardiovascular endpoints. METHODS: In a single-centre, randomized, open, endpoint-blinded, parallel group study, 232 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomized to treatment with carvedilol or atenolol. LVEF was measured by gated blood pool scintigraphy during the first week and after 12 months. The treatment was given orally within 24 h. The mean dose was 36.2 and 72.1 mg in the carvedilol and atenolol groups, respectively. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two study groups in the mean global and regional LVEF. There tended to be fewer first serious cardiovascular events in the carvedilol compared with the atenolol group (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p = 0.39). Cold hands and feet were observed less frequently in the carvedilol group (20 vs. 33%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: In patients following an acute myocardial infarction, no difference in either global or regional LVEF was observed between baseline and 12 months when treatment with carvedilol was compared with atenolol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jónsson et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (n=232). carvedilol vs. atenolol was evaluated on first serious cardiovascular events (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p=0.39). Carvedilol did not significantly differ from atenolol in global or regional LVEF or first serious cardiovascular events (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.56-1.23; P=0.39) after acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: