Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vegetation cooling in cities is often represented as a local, isotropic effect, although atmospheric processes can redistribute cooling beyond individual vegetation patches. This simplification may overlook the nonlocal and directionally structured nature of cooling propagation. We developed a physics-guided source–medium–receiver (SMR) framework for the Greater Bay Area of China to compare multi-source isotropic connectivity with prevailing-wind-conditioned connectivity. Vegetation-source strength was represented by the VCSI, and parameters estimated from 2021 to 2023 were frozen for an independent 2024 holdout and contrasting monsoon assessments. Cooling connectivity was modeled using a spatially varying distance-decay function, controlled by the wind speed, moisture content, surface albedo, terrain, and directional constraints from prevailing winds. In 2024, isotropic connectivity showed a stronger relationship with LST (r = −0.8069) than wind-conditioned connectivity (r = −0.7780) and local VCSI (r = −0.7757), with the same general ordering across monsoon and built-up receiver assessments. The source-level decay lengths ranged from 0.504 to 0.518 km, whereas the wind-conditioned emergent multi-source persistence increased from 4.13 to 4.88 km, reflecting cumulative field behaviors. Wind-relative decomposition further showed that annual connectivity was distributed across downwind, crosswind, and upwind pathways. These findings indicate that regional vegetation cooling is primarily characterized by distance-mediated, multi-source connectivity, while prevailing-wind direction acts as a scale- and condition-dependent modifier. This shift in perspective provides a physically grounded framework for effective urban climate analysis and precision greening strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qasim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: