Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To evaluate the technical success, clinical success, and complication rates of endovascular revascularization for below-the-elbow (BTE) peripheral artery disease. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 19 patients (mean age 63 years; 12 men) with critical hand ischemia (CHI) who underwent 25 interventions in 19 arms between October 2010 and June 2017. Access was attained using 4-F or 5-F sheaths via antegrade brachial, retrograde radial, or fistula/graft access routes depending on the target vessel. A 0.018-inch hydrophilic microwire was used for intimal or subintimal recanalization. Angioplasty was performed over a 0.014-inch guidewire using low-profile balloons. The primary endpoint of the study was technical success, defined as successful lesion crossing/dilation, with residual stenosis <30%. Clinical success referred to improvement in pain and/or steal symptoms. Results: Technical success was achieved in 88% (22 of 25 procedures), with no significant difference in outcome associated with indications or baseline vessel disease. Complications occurred in 6 cases, of which 5 were minor and 1 was major. Clinical success was achieved in 12 of 14 patients with available follow-up; 5 of 7 patients with ulcers experienced wound healing. Conclusion: Endovascular revascularization for BTE occlusive disease is an effective and safe strategy for treating CHI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: