Key result
Interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using the 2014 AHA guidelines provided more accurate diagnostic values than the 2004 NHBEP guidelines in a pediatric hospital.
Why the study?
There was confusion and discrepancy in diagnosing hypertension in pediatric patients due to different ABPM interpretation guidelines used by nephrology and cardiology services.
Does the use of the 2014 AHA guidelines improve the accuracy of ABPM interpretation compared to the 2004 NHBEP fourth report in pediatric patients?
Observational
No
Does the use of the 2014 AHA guidelines improve the accuracy of ABPM interpretation compared to the 2004 NHBEP fourth report in pediatric patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 2014 AHA guidelines provide more accurate and consistent interpretation of ABPM results for diagnosing hypertension in children compared to older guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a standard screening tool for the diagnosis of hypertension in children, adolescents, and adults. However, there is confusion and misunderstanding about which guidelines can provide the most accurate diagnostic values. LOCAL PROBLEM: At a large, free-standing pediatric hospital, ABPM testing was historically being conducted by both nephrology and cardiology departments. The nephrology service was using the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, published in 2014 for interpretation of results and for diagnosis of hypertension, whereas the cardiology service depended on the 2004 National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBEP) fourth report, which led to discrepancies in diagnosis of hypertension in this patient population. METHODS: A nurse practitioner-led quality improvement project was designed and implemented to determine the best method of ABPM monitoring and test interpretation based on comparing results of patients using height, gender, and application of either the 2004 NHBEP fourth report or 2014 AHA guidelines. INTERVENTIONS: Using a retrospective chart review, ABPM monitoring results from both cardiology and nephrology services were reviewed and compared to identify the most accurate methods and to recommend changes to practice. RESULTS: Accuracy of interpretation for ABPM is best accomplished using the 2014 AHA guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Using a single method of interpretation provides consistent diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in children. Nurse practitioners can apply this knowledge in other settings to manage hypertension and provide similar services in different settings, including primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burke et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Hypertension. 2014 AHA guidelines for ABPM interpretation vs. 2004 NHBEP fourth report guidelines was evaluated on Accuracy of interpretation for ABPM. Interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using the 2014 AHA guidelines provided more accurate diagnostic values than the 2004 NHBEP guidelines in a pediatric hospital.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: