Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background. Kleiber’s law describes the quantitative association between whole-body resting energy expenditure (REE, in kcal/d) and body mass ( M , in kg) across mature mammals as REE = 70.0 × M 0.75 . The basis of this empirical function is uncertain. Objectives. The study objective was to establish an organ-tissue level REE model across mammals and to explore the body composition and physiologic basis of Kleiber’s law. Design. We evaluated the hypothesis that REE in mature mammals can be predicted by a combination of two variables: the mass of individual organs/tissues and their corresponding specific resting metabolic rates. Data on the mass of organs with high metabolic rate (i.e., liver, brain, heart, and kidneys) for 111 species ranging in body mass from 0.0075 (shrew) to 6650 kg (elephant) were obtained from a literature review. Results. REE p predicted by the organ-tissue level model was correlated with body mass (correlation r = 0.9975 ) and resulted in the function REE p = 66.33 × M 0.754 , with a coefficient and scaling exponent, respectively, close to 70.0 and 0.75 ( P > 0.05 ) as observed by Kleiber. There were no differences between REE p and REE k calculated by Kleiber’s law; REE p was correlated ( r = 0.9994 ) with REE k . The mass-specific REE p , that is, ( REE / M ) p , was correlated with body mass ( r = 0.9779 ) with a scaling exponent −0.246, close to −0.25 as observed with Kleiber’s law. Conclusion. Our findings provide new insights into the organ/tissue energetic components of Kleiber’s law. The observed large rise in REE and lowering of REE/ M from shrew to elephant can be explained by corresponding changes in organ/tissue mass and associated specific metabolic rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: