This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Agricultural development and production management crucially depend on efficient and accurate acquisition of crop growth information. This study focuses on maize, employing drones to monitor its growth based on metrics such as plant height (PH), SPAD values and leaf area index (LAI). Using the entropy weighting method (EWM) and coefficient of variation method (CV), comprehensive growth indices, CGMIEWM and CGMICV, were developed. These indices were correlated with 10 vegetation indices to select those with significant relevance. Subsequently, three machine learning methods—partial least squares (PLS), random forest (RF) and particle swarm optimisation‐enhanced random forest (PSO‐RF)—were utilised to construct models for inversely monitoring maize growth. The optimal model was determined through evaluative metrics, leading to the acquisition of spatial distribution information on maize growth within the study area. The results indicate that the CGMIEWM derived from the entropy weight method shows a higher correlation than individual indices, significantly enhancing model precision over traditional single‐index monitoring. Among the modelling techniques, the PSO‐RF model achieved the best predictive accuracy for CGMIEMW, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.751, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.102 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.074, indicating superior estimation precision over CGMICV. Based on the optimal model PSO‐RF‐CGMIEMW, the spatial distribution and statistical results of maize inversion imagery demonstrate that the simulation results align well with the experimental data, indicating a good performance of the simulation inversion. This study investigates the development of a model for monitoring maize growth stages and evaluates the effectiveness of the monitoring. The findings verify the precision and reliability of this method, providing vital insights for maize growth monitoring and field management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: