Digital exclusion may constrain everyday functioning among older adults as access to information, services, and social participation increasingly depends on digital competence. This controlled quasi-experimental pretest-posttest-follow-up study examined whether an 8-week Digital Control Cognition Model-based digital literacy program improved digital literacy, sense of control, and short-term cognitive performance among older adults attending community-based elderly care centers. A total of 132 participants aged 65 years or older were assigned to an intervention group or a usual-care waitlist control group, with 66 participants in each group. The intervention comprised 16 structured sessions delivered over 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week post-intervention follow-up. Outcomes included sense of control, delayed memory, visual scanning and processing speed, brief cognitive screening performance, and mobile-device proficiency. Repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and bias-corrected bootstrap mediation were applied. At post-intervention, the intervention group showed higher sense-of-control scores (22.6 vs 18.7), better delayed-memory scores (6.4 vs 5.0), faster Trail Making Test Part A completion (50.4 vs 60.8 s), lower 6-item Cognitive Impairment Test scores (4.1 vs 5.4), and higher mobile-device proficiency scores (54.6 vs 38.4) than the control group. Significant indirect effects through sense of control were observed for delayed memory (0.318), Trail Making Test performance (−1.784), and brief cognitive screening scores (−0.286). The findings indicate that structured digital literacy training may strengthen digital competence and perceived control while supporting short-term improvement or maintenance in selected cognitive test outcomes. Longer follow-up and more rigorous randomized designs are required before concluding that such training alters cognitive aging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: