Key result
Low-EF, low-gradient severe AS linked to ~63% higher one-year mortality after TAVI vs. high-gradient AS.
Why the study?
The outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI for different subtypes of severe aortic stenosis based on flow, gradient, and ejection fraction were not well characterized.
Does the outcome of TAVI differ among patients with low-EF low-gradient, paradoxical low-gradient, and high-gradient severe aortic stenosis?
Cohort
Yes
Does the outcome of TAVI differ among patients with low-EF low-gradient, paradoxical low-gradient, and high-gradient severe aortic stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 32.3% vs 19.8%
p-value: p=0.001
Patients with low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and reduced EF have significantly higher one-year mortality after TAVI compared to those with high-gradient AS, whereas those with preserved EF have comparable outcomes.
LEF-LGAS patients show higher post-TAVI mortality than HGAS; observational data leaves open optimal risk stratification for low-gradient subtypes.
AIMS: The study analyses the outcome of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for different subtypes of severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on data from the GARY registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Low-EF, low-gradient (LEF-LGAS: EF ≤40%, MPG <40 mmHg), paradoxical low-gradient (PLF-LGAS: EF ≥50%, MPG <40 mmHg) and high-gradient AS (HGAS: MPG ≥40 mmHg) were observed in 11.7% (n=359), 20.8% (n=640) and 60.6% (n=1,864) of the study population, respectively. EuroSCORE I (36.7±20.9 vs. 22.6±15.7 vs. 24.3±17.4; p<0.001) differed significantly among subgroups. In-hospital and one-year mortality were higher in patients with LEF-LGAS compared to HGAS (in-hospital: 7.8% vs. 4.9%; p=0.029; one-year: 32.3% vs. 19.8%; p=0.001). In contrast, mortality in patients with PLF-LGAS was comparable to patients with HGAS (in-hospital: PLF-LGAS: 5.3%; p=0.67; one-year: 22.3%; p=0.192). The rate of TAVI-associated complications was not significantly different among groups. However, postoperative low cardiac output occurred significantly more frequently in patients with LEF-LGAS Conclusions: Severe AS with a reduced transaortic flow and gradient is a common finding and is present in >30% of patients undergoing TAVI. Patients with low flow and impaired LV function have a significantly higher mortality within the first year after TAVI. In contrast, the outcome of patients with low flow and preserved EF is comparable to those with a high transvalvular aortic gradient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauten et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis. Low-EF, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LEF-LGAS) vs. High-gradient severe aortic stenosis (HGAS) was evaluated on One-year mortality (p=0.001). Patients with low-EF, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI had significantly higher one-year mortality compared to those with high-gradient aortic stenosis (32.3% vs. 19.8%; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: