Key result
Pericardial and visceral fat correlate moderately with vascular inflammation on FDG-PET.
Why the study?
The relative implications of pericardial adipose tissue, abdominal visceral fat, and subcutaneous fat on vascular inflammation have not been explored.
Are pericardial, visceral, and subcutaneous adipose tissues associated with vascular inflammation in individuals without diabetes or CVD?
Cross-Sectional (n=93)
No
Are pericardial, visceral, and subcutaneous adipose tissues associated with vascular inflammation in individuals without diabetes or CVD?
Effect estimate: r = 0.48 and r = 0.45
p-value: p=<0.001
Pericardial and visceral adipose tissue are significantly associated with vascular inflammation measured by 18FDG-PET/CT in individuals without diabetes or CVD.
PAT-vascular inflammation link is hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed to clarify independence from abdominal fat and clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the relative implications of PAT, abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue on vascular inflammation have not been explored. METHOD AND RESULTS: We compared the association of PAT, abdominal visceral fat area (VFA), and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) with vascular inflammation, represented as the target-to-background ratio (TBR), the blood-normalized standardized uptake value measured using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET) in 93 men and women without diabetes or CVD. Age- and sex-adjusted correlation analysis showed that PAT, VFA, and SFA were positively associated with most cardiometabolic risk factors, including systolic blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin resistance and high sensitive C-reactive proteins (hsCRP), whereas they were negatively associated with HDL-cholesterol. In particular, the maximum TBR (maxTBR) values were positively correlated with PAT and VFA (r = 0.48 and r = 0.45, respectively; both P <0.001), whereas SFA showed a relatively weak positive relationship with maxTBR level (r = 0.31, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that both PAT and VFA are significantly and similarly associated with vascular inflammation and various cardiometabolic risk profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Vascular inflammation (n=93). Pericardial adipose tissue and visceral fat area vs. Subcutaneous fat area was evaluated on Vascular inflammation represented as maximum target-to-background ratio (maxTBR) measured using 18FDG-PET (r = 0.48 and r = 0.45, p=<0.001). Pericardial adipose tissue and visceral fat area were significantly and positively correlated with vascular inflammation (r = 0.48 and r = 0.45, respectively; both P <0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: