Key result
Expanding coronary revascularization narrows gender and socioeconomic gaps despite ~250% procedure growth in women.
Why the study?
The study explored how the increased supply of coronary bypass operations and angioplasties from 1988 to 1996 influenced socioeconomic and gender equity in their use in Finland.
Does an increased supply of coronary revascularization procedures improve socioeconomic and gender equity in their use?
Observational
Yes
Does an increased supply of coronary revascularization procedures improve socioeconomic and gender equity in their use?
Despite a massive increase in the supply of coronary revascularization procedures in Finland, socioeconomic and gender inequities in access relative to need persisted.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Expanded revascularization supply failed to close gender and socioeconomic gaps; leaves open whether targeted policies beyond capacity growth can achieve equity.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore how the increased supply of coronary bypass operations and angioplasties from 1988 to 1996 influenced socioeconomic and gender equity in their use. DESIGN: Register based linkage study; information on coronary procedures from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register in 1988 and 1996 was individually linked to national population censuses in 1970-1995 to obtain patients' socioeconomic data. Data on both hospitalisations and mortality attributable to coronary heart disease obtained from similar linkage schemes were used to approximate the relative need of procedures in socioeconomic groups. SETTING: Finland, 2,094,846 inhabitants in 1988 and 2,401,027 in 1996 aged 40 years and older, and Discharge Register data from all Finnish hospitals offering coronary procedures in 1988 and 1996. MAIN RESULTS: The overall rate of coronary revascularisations in Finland increased by about 140% for men and 250% for women from 1988 to 1996. Over the same period, socioeconomic and gender disparities in operation rates diminished, as did the influence of regional supply of procedures on the extent of these differences. However, men, and better off groups in terms of occupation, education, and family income, continued to receive more operations than women and the worse off with the same level of need. CONCLUSIONS: Although revascularisations in Finland increased 2.5-fold overall, some socioeconomic and gender inequities persisted in the use of cardiac operations relative to need. To improve equity, a further increase of resources may be needed, and practices taking socioeconomic and gender equity into account should be developed for the referral of coronary heart disease patients to hospital investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiina Hetemaa (2003) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease. Increased supply of coronary revascularizations vs. 1988 baseline supply levels was evaluated on Socioeconomic and gender equity in the use of coronary revascularizations relative to need. From 1988 to 1996, coronary revascularization rates in Finland increased by 140% for men and 250% for women, diminishing disparities, though men and higher socioeconomic groups still received more.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: