Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study reveals double arcsine transformation outperforms logit modeling in prevalence meta-analyses, indicating improved accuracy for multi-category disease estimates.
Meta-analysis is a method to obtain a weighted average of results from various studies. In addition to pooling effect sizes, meta-analysis can also be used to estimate disease frequencies, such as incidence and prevalence. In this article we present methods for the meta-analysis of prevalence. We discuss the logit and double arcsine transformations to stabilise the variance. We note the special situation of multiple category prevalence, and propose solutions to the problems that arise. We describe the implementation of these methods in the MetaXL software, and present a simulation study and the example of multiple sclerosis from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 project. We conclude that the double arcsine transformation is preferred over the logit, and that the MetaXL implementation of multiple category prevalence is an improvement in the methodology of the meta-analysis of prevalence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barendregt et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: