Key result
The bedside immunochromatography kit demonstrated 95% sensitivity compared to virus isolation and 91% sensitivity compared to PCR for detecting human adenovirus in respiratory samples.
Why the study?
Does an immunochromatography kit accurately detect human adenovirus in respiratory samples compared to virus isolation and PCR?
Cross-Sectional (n=138)
No
Does an immunochromatography kit accurately detect human adenovirus in respiratory samples compared to virus isolation and PCR?
The immunochromatography kit is a highly sensitive bedside diagnostic tool for human adenovirus infections, though negative results do not definitively rule out infection.
May enable faster point-of-care adenovirus diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation and outcome studies.
An immunochromatography (IC) kit for human adenovirus (HAdV) was evaluated with 138 patient nasopharyngeal samples. The samples were collected at a sentinel clinic in Japan from January through June 2003. Patients were diagnosed by clinical manifestation of pharyngoconjunctival fever (n = 38) or exudative tonsillitis (n = 100). The IC kit was positive for 84% (116 of 138) of patients diagnosed at bedside. The remaining extract solution of the IC kit test was transferred into maintenance medium and tested via laboratory diagnoses. The IC kit had 95% sensitivity (116 of 122 patients) with HAdV isolation (isolation) as the standard and 91% sensitivity (116 of 128 patients) with PCR as the standard. All of the IC kit-positive samples were isolation and PCR positive. Similarly, all the isolation-positive samples were PCR positive. Twenty-two IC kit-negative samples were evaluated by real-time PCR. Six samples were IC kit negative and isolation positive and contained 3.8 x 10(7) to 2.5 x 10(9) copies of the HAdV genome/ml. Five samples that were only PCR positive contained 3.0 x 10(4) to 3.8 x 10(5) copies of the HAdV genome/ml, but one sample was real-time PCR negative. We conclude that the IC kit is a useful bedside diagnostic tool for HAdV infections because it has 95% sensitivity (compared to isolation), but a negative result does not always rule out HAdV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujimoto et al. (2004) conducted a cross-sectional in Human adenovirus (HAdV) infection (n=138). Immunochromatography (IC) kit vs. Virus isolation and PCR was evaluated on Sensitivity for detection of human adenovirus compared to virus isolation. The bedside immunochromatography kit demonstrated 95% sensitivity compared to virus isolation and 91% sensitivity compared to PCR for detecting human adenovirus in respiratory samples.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: