Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Maintaining the natural alignment of the spine during sleep is directly linked to musculoskeletal health, and the firmness of the mattress and pillow play a key role in this process.However, previous studies have largely relied on simple statistical indicators and have been limited in their precision of evaluating the balance of pressure distribution.Objectives: This study aimed to objectively evaluate the lumbar and cervical support of air-web material mattresses and pillows using AI technology and to identify optimal firmness parameters.Methods: Thirty healthy adults (15 men and 15 women aged 20~60 years) participated in the study.Body pressure distribution was measured using a high-resolution pressure mapping sensor (26×62, 1,612 sensels) for five mattresses (density 50~90 kg/m 3 ) and three pillows.We defined selective support and two novel indices that incorporate biomechanical limits: the Lumbar Support Index (LSI) and the Cervical Support Index (CSI).The performance of five machine-learning models was evaluated for classifying high-support conditions.Results: Among the five tested mattresses, Mattress C (70 kg/m 3 ) demonstrated the highest support, with a support score of 58.19, while Pillow 2 showed the best performance in terms of cervical alignment.Quadratic regression analysis estimated the optimal density at 74.74 kg/m 3 , indicating that the "medium-hard" category is optimal.Finally, the AI models achieved strong performance (ROC-AUC=0.84),suggesting that the LSI is intuitive and grounded in explainable physical principles.Conclusions: This study proposes new support indices based on body pressure distribution and identifies the 70~80 kg/m 3 range as a "golden zone" that provides appropriate support for most users.These findings offer a new framework for evaluating sleep products using objective data and AI-based analysis and may serve as foundational evidence for developing personalized sleep solutions in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: