Key result
Noncoronary atherosclerosis linked to ~4-fold higher odds of obstructive CAD.
Why the study?
The diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography is low in subjects with suspected obstructive CAD despite widespread use of noninvasive testing.
Does ultrasound-based assessment of noncoronary atherosclerosis predict obstructive CAD in subjects with suspected stable CAD intended for invasive coronary angiography?
Observational (n=2,216)
No
Does ultrasound-based assessment of noncoronary atherosclerosis predict obstructive CAD in subjects with suspected stable CAD intended for invasive coronary angiography?
The evaluation of noncoronary atherosclerosis, particularly carotid artery plaque, strongly predicts obstructive CAD and can help direct subsequent diagnostic procedures in patients with suspected CAD.
Noncoronary atherosclerosis may refine CAD risk stratification; leaves open its effect on management and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of noninvasive testing prior to invasive coronary diagnostic the diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography has been reported low in subjects with suspected obstructive CAD. OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of noncoronary atherosclerosis (NCA) in subjects with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD) intended to invasive coronary angiography. METHODS: Ultrasound-based assessment of carotid artery plaque (CAP), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) was performed in 2216 subjects with suspected CAD prior to coronary angiography. Logistic regression and c-statistics were used to analyze the diagnostic value of NCA for the presence of obstructive CAD and the intention to revascularization. RESULTS: Percentage of positive results of elective coronary angiography was low but comparable to other studies (41% obstructive CAD). We identified 1323 subjects (60%) with NCA, most of them were characterized by CAP (93%). CAP independently predicted obstructive CAD in addition to traditional risk factors and clinical factors while CIMT and ABI failed to improve the prediction. The presence of NCA and typical angina were the strongest predictors for obstructive CAD (OR 4.0 and 2.4, respectively). A large subgroup of patients (n = 703, 32%) with atypical clinical presentation and lack of NCA revealed a low indication for revascularization <15% indicating a large proportion of subjects with non-obstructive CAD in this subgroup. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of noncoronary atherosclerosis has the potential to impact clinical decision making and to direct subsequent diagnostic procedures in subjects with suspected coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00497887.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weissgerber et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Suspected stable coronary artery disease (n=2,216). Noncoronary atherosclerosis (NCA) vs. Absence of noncoronary atherosclerosis was evaluated on Presence of obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) confirmed by coronary angiography (OR 4.05, 95% CI 3.35-4.90, p=<0.001). The presence of noncoronary atherosclerosis strongly predicted obstructive coronary artery disease in subjects with suspected stable CAD (OR 4.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: