Why the study?
The evaluation value of different reconstruction methods of enhanced CT images on cardiac structure dose in breast cancer radiotherapy patients was unclear.
Do different reconstruction methods of enhanced CT images (MIP, MinIP, AIP) provide comparable cardiac structural dose assessments to standard enhanced CT in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer?
Do different reconstruction methods of enhanced CT images (MIP, MinIP, AIP) provide comparable cardiac structural dose assessments to standard enhanced CT in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer?
Maximum intensity projection (MIP) imaging provides comparable left ventricular dose-volume assessment to standard enhanced CT and can serve as a supplementary method for cardiac dose evaluation in breast cancer radiotherapy.
MIP may support supplementary LV dosimetry in breast cancer RT; leaves open prospective validation before wider adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the evaluation value of different reconstruction methods of enhanced computed tomography (CT) images on the cardiac structure dose in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the cardiac structure data of 200 female patients with left-sided breast cancer, who underwent enhanced CT scans was conducted. Image reconstruction was performed with a time interval of 5% of the cardiac cycle (0%-95%), obtaining maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection (MinIP), and average intensity projection (AIP) images. The left ventricle (LV) and the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were delineated on the four types of images. RESULTS: The MinIP, MIP, and AIP images showed larger LAD volumes than enhanced CT images (P < 0.05). Compared with the dose sum, the changes in V5Gy, V30Gy, V40Gy, Dmax, and Dmean for LV on MIP images were all <5% (4.02%, 2.17%, 1.39%, 2.99%, and 1.93%, respectively). The Dmax and Dmean change rates for LV on MinIP images were both <5%, at 2.00% and 4.73%, respectively; the Dmax and Dmean change rates for LV on AIP images were also both <5%, at 3.01% and 3.99%. Compared with the dose sum, only the Dmax change rates for LAD on MIP, MinIP, and AIP images were <5% (all P > 0.05), at 4.96%, 4.01%, and 4.07%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In LV dose-volume assessment, the differences in assessment metrics between MIP images and enhanced CT images are small, indicating that MIP imaging can serve as a supplementary method to enhanced CT imaging for this form of assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: