Key result
Pre-operative contrast CT fails to improve LAD visualization over post-operative non-contrast CT.
Why the study?
The visualisation of the left anterior descending coronary artery on CT images used for breast radiation treatment planning and the impact of intravenous contrast media on this visualisation were uncertain.
Does pre-operative CT with IV contrast improve the visualisation of the LAD coronary artery compared to post-operative non-contrast CT in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy planning?
Observational (n=25)
Does pre-operative CT with IV contrast improve the visualisation of the LAD coronary artery compared to post-operative non-contrast CT in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy planning?
p-value: p=0.34 for the radiologist; 0.90 for the radiation oncologist
Contrast-enhanced imaging before breast surgery does not improve the objective visualization of the LAD artery on planning CTs, highlighting inconsistencies in contouring heart vessels for radiation dose reporting.
Standard planning CT limits reliable LAD dosimetry in left breast RT; leaves open whether atlases or advanced imaging improve contouring consistency.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the visualisation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery on CT images used for breast radiation treatment planning. METHODS: Delineation of the LAD artery was achieved for 25 breast patients by 1 radiologist and 1 radiation oncologist independently on two sets of images for each patient: one pre-operative CT scan using intravenous (IV) contrast media to determine the primary gross tumour volume (GTV) and one post-operative CT scan used for treatment planning. A Student's paired t-test was used to compare the number of CT slices in which the LAD was visible for each patient in the two series. Interpolations and extrapolations of the LAD volume were performed for the left-sided cases using a published heart atlas in order to report doses to the LAD structure. RESULTS: There was a non-significant difference between the results with and without IV contrast media (p=0.34 for the radiologist; p=0.90 for the radiation oncologist). The visible LAD artery corresponded to a 30% portion (range 12-47%) of the interpolated structure. The maximum dose to the left artery varied widely, from 2.7 to 41.7 Gy, in the group of patients with left breast tumours. The largest values (>25 Gy) corresponded to those patients in whom the LAD artery distal extremity lay inside the breast fields. CONCLUSIONS: With the current planning CT protocol, only one-third of the LAD artery could be objectively visualised. Contrast-enhanced imaging used for GTV delineation before the breast surgery did not improve the visualisation of the artery. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study has revealed the lack of consistency that may be encountered when contouring heart vessels, thereby questioning the reliability of dose reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vennarini et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Breast cancer requiring radiotherapy (n=25). Pre-operative CT scan with intravenous contrast media vs. Post-operative CT scan without contrast media was evaluated on Number of CT slices in which the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery was visible (p=0.34 for the radiologist; 0.90 for the radiation oncologist). Pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT did not significantly improve the visualisation of the left anterior descending coronary artery compared to post-operative non-contrast CT.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: