Key result
Filter-protected carotid artery stenting yields a 2% 30-day stroke and death rate.
Why the study?
Neurologic events from embolization during carotid artery stenting may complicate the procedure, and strategies to capture embolic particles are being evaluated for efficacy in reducing these events.
Is carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system feasible and safe in patients requiring carotid intervention?
Population
162 patients (164 hemispheres) undergoing carotid artery stenting
Comparison
Carotid artery stenting with filter protection system
Design
Prospective multicenter evaluation at three institutions
Follow-up
30-day
Authors
Loading...
Supports filter-protected carotid stenting feasibility in selected patients; leaves open randomized comparisons to endarterectomy or unprotected stenting.
Observational (n=162)
Yes
Is carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system feasible and safe in patients requiring carotid intervention?
The use of a filter protection system during carotid artery stenting is technically feasible with a high success rate and a low 30-day rate of stroke and death.
Al‐Mubarak et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Carotid artery disease (n=162). Carotid artery stenting with filter protection was evaluated on overall combined 30-day rate of all-stroke and death. Carotid artery stenting with filter protection was technically feasible, with a 99% angiographic success rate and a 2% combined 30-day rate of all-stroke and death.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: