This paper estimates a dynamic model of annuitisation in which individuals hold subjective survival beliefs that may differ from their actual mortality risk. I show that biased survival beliefs reduce annuitisation at retirement but generate additional annuity demand at older ages. Overall, individuals under-annuitise by 10.1% during retirement and delay the average age of annuitisation by 3.7 years relative to the objective benchmark. The average welfare loss resulting from biased survival beliefs is equivalent to 2.9% of retirement-age assets. About 31% of this loss is attributable to pessimism about survival, while the remaining 69% reflects misperceptions of how mortality risk increases with age. Counterfactual policy experiments suggest that subsidies for annuity purchases early in retirement financed by taxing later purchases would improve welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tianyu Pang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: