Key result
A twofold increase in the distance of tobacco product outlets from residence was associated with a lower probability of depression (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96).
Why the study?
Does higher density and closer proximity of tobacco and ENDS outlets increase the probability of depression, anxiety, and stress in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,674)
Yes
Does higher density and closer proximity of tobacco and ENDS outlets increase the probability of depression, anxiety, and stress in adults?
Odds Ratio: 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.96)
Closer proximity and higher density of tobacco and electronic nicotine delivery system outlets are associated with increased probabilities of depression, anxiety, and stress.
Should not yet change practice or policy; cross-sectional data leave causal effects on depression open.
Aim. To study the relationship of the density and proximity of tobacco products (TPs) and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) with increased levels of depression, anxiety and stress among the population in 3 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Material and methods. The work used data from the Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Diseases and their Risk Factors in Regions of Russian Federation-3 (ESSE-RF3) study in 3 Russian regions (Arkhangelsk, Sverdlovsk and Tver regions) among the population aged 35-64 years (n=1674), who signed a consent to participate in the study. We analyzed data on the status of smoking and consumption of ENDS, passive smoking, attempts to quit smoking, as well as the presence of depression, anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score ≥8) and stress (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) >21). Elements of urban infrastructure (data collection: January-March 2022) selling TPs and ENDS were assessed using aт OpenStreetMap-based program. Associations were established using logistic regression analysis. Results. With a twofold increase in the distance of TP and ENDS outlets from the place of residence, the depression probability was reduced by 13% (odds ratio (OR) 0,87; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0,79-0,96) and by 12% (OR 0,88; 95% CI: 0,78-0,99), respectively. With increase in distance from of TP outlets, the anxiety decreased probability by 12% (OR 0,88; 95% CI: 0,81-0,97). With an increase in the number of TP outlets within a radius of 1000 m from the place of residence, there were an increase in the probability of depression (OR 1,18; 95% CI: 1,031,36), anxiety (OR 1,12; 95% CI: 1-1,26) and stress (OR 1,24; 95% CI: 1,05-1,46). A greater number of ENDS outlets within a radius of 1000 m and 400 m was associated with a high likelihood of depression (OR 1,17; 95% CI: 1,02-1,34 and OR 1,25; 95% CI: 1,04-1,47, respectively). An increased depression probability was found in those exposed to tobacco smoke at home (OR 1,88; 95% CI: 1,27-2,73) and at work (OR 1,67; 95% CI: 1,14-2,41). An increase in the number of attempts to quit smoking doubles the odds of depression (OR 2,40; 95% CI: 1,35-4,23) and anxiety (OR 2,00; 95% CI: 1,18-3,38). Conclusion . Unfavorable environmental factors, including the proximity and density of TP and ENDS outlets, can increase the probability of depression, anxiety and stress among the population living in these areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gambaryan et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression, anxiety, and stress (n=1,674). Proximity and density of tobacco and ENDS outlets vs. Greater distance or lower density of outlets was evaluated on Depression (HADS score ≥8) (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96). A twofold increase in the distance of tobacco product outlets from residence was associated with a lower probability of depression (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: