BACKGROUND: A hernia service within a general hospital was prospectively evaluated to establish whether evidence-based protocols could deliver results comparable to those reported from specialist hernia clinics. METHODS: Protocols were devised according to established models. With the support of a nurse specialist, 1015 patients with inguinal hernia were treated. Quality-of-life analysis was undertaken using the Short Form 36. RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 16-98 years (median, 56 years). Ambulatory day-case surgery was achieved in 820 patients (81%), with local anaesthesia in 891 (88%). Wound infection occurred in 10 patients (0.98%). Wound haematoma requiring surgical intervention occurred in three patients. Two patients formed wound seromas that settled spontaneously. One patient developed ischaemic orchitis resulting in testicular atrophy. At 5 days after operation, 91% of patients had returned to normal activity. At 1 year, 7 patients (0.7%) had pain sufficient to limit normal activity or employment. There were 8 recurrences (0.78%) at a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Quality-of-life was enhanced at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: A protocol-driven hernia service within a general hospital can provide patient outcomes comparable to specialist hernia clinics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kingsnorth et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: