This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This essay challenges the dominant Western model of affective flourishing, which emphasizes regulating emotions through cognitive control and evaluative judgment. Drawing on Zhuangzi’s Daoist philosophy, I propose a Zhuangzi-inspired account centered on two interrelated strategies: a restrictive approach, which highlights the self-regulating nature of emotions when left undisturbed, and a positive approach, which focuses on cultivating existential feelings—pre-reflective orientations that shape emotional experience. Rather than disciplining emotions, Zhuangzi advocates a stance of attunement, allowing emotions to flow naturally in harmony with the Dao. Through close analysis of key passages—such as ‘fasting of the mind’ and ‘following what-is-so-of-itself’—I argue that a Zhuangzi-inspired account of emotion regulation rejects rigid emotional hierarchies and coercive regulation. Instead, the sage’s distinctive affective life emerges from existential feelings nurtured through a non-interventionist engagement with the world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiannan Li (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Asian Philosophy