Key result
Evolocumab reduces cardiovascular events consistently across age and sex subgroups.
Why the study?
Some trials have reported diminished efficacy for statins in the elderly and in women compared with men, motivating evaluation of evolocumab efficacy and safety by age and sex.
Does evolocumab reduce cardiovascular events compared to placebo in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on statin therapy, regardless of age and sex?
RCT (n=27,564)
double blind
randomised
Does evolocumab reduce cardiovascular events compared to placebo in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease on statin therapy, regardless of age and sex?
Evolocumab provides consistent cardiovascular risk reduction across a broad range of ages and in both men and women with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports evolocumab use across ages and sexes in ASCVD; confirms consistent relative benefits without interactions in this RCT.
AIMS: Some trials have reported diminished efficacy for statins in the elderly, and in women compared with men. We examined the efficacy and safety of evolocumab by patient age and sex in the FOURIER trial, the first major cardiovascular outcome trial of a PCSK9 inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS: FOURIER was a randomised, double blind trial, comparing evolocumab with placebo in 27,564 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease receiving statin therapy (median follow-up 2.2 years). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalisation for unstable angina or coronary revascularisation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the efficacy of evolocumab versus placebo stratified by quartiles of patient age and by sex. There were small variations in the cardiovascular event rate across the age range (for the primary endpoint, Kaplan-Meier at 3 years 15.6%, >69 years, vs. 15.1%, ≤56 years, P = 0.45); however, the relative efficacy of evolocumab was consistent regardless of patient age (for the primary endpoint (Q1 hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) 0.83, 0.72-0.96, Q2 0.88, 0.76-1.01, Q3 0.82, 0.71-0.95, Q4 0.86, 0.74-1.00; Pinteraction = 0.91), and the key secondary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) (Q1 0.74 (0.61-0.89), Q2 0.83 (0.69-1.00), Q3 0.78 (0.65-0.94), Q4 0.82 (0.69-0.98)); Pinteraction = 0.81). Women had a lower primary endpoint rate than men (Kaplan-Meier at 3 years 12.5 vs. 15.3%, respectively, P < 0.001). Relative risk reductions in the primary endpoint and key secondary endpoint were similar in women (0.81 (0.69-0.95) and 0.74 (0.61-0.90), respectively) compared with men (0.86 (0.80-0.94) and 0.81 (0.73-0.90), respectively), Pinteraction = 0.48 and 0.44, respectively. Adverse events were more common in women and with increasing age but, with the exception of injection site reactions, there were no important significant differences reported by those assigned evolocumab versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of evolocumab are similar throughout a broad range of ages and in both men and women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sever et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=27,564). evolocumab vs. placebo was evaluated on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalisation for unstable angina or coronary revascularisation. Evolocumab reduced the risk of cardiovascular events with consistent efficacy across age groups (P-interaction=0.91) and in both men and women (P-interaction=0.48).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: