Key result
Dalteparin prophylaxis compared to observation resulted in a non-significant reduction in VTE incidence among high-risk cancer patients (12% vs 21%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89).
Why the study?
The value of screening vascular imaging for diagnosing incidental VTE in high-risk asymptomatic cancer patients was unclear.
Does dalteparin prophylaxis reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic high-risk cancer patients?
RCT (n=117)
Yes
Does dalteparin prophylaxis reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic high-risk cancer patients?
Adding screening venous ultrasound to routine oncologic surveillance CT in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients increases the detection of asymptomatic venous thromboembolism.
Does not support routine dalteparin prophylaxis in high-risk cancer patients; leaves open whether VTE prevention benefits this population.
OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively examined the venous thromboembolism (VTE) events diagnosed in the Prophylaxis of High-Risk Ambulatory Cancer Patients Study (PHACS), a multi-center randomized trial, to assess the value of screening vascular imaging for the diagnosis of incidental VTE in high-risk cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 117 asymptomatic cancer patients with a Khorana score ≥3 starting a new systemic chemotherapy regimen were enrolled in a prospective randomized control trial. Patients underwent baseline venous ultrasound (US) of the lower extremities (LEs) and screening contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT). Those without preexisting VTE were then randomized into observation or dalteparin prophylaxis groups and were screened with serial US every 4 weeks for up to 12 weeks and imaged with contrast-enhanced chest CT at 12 weeks. Any additional imaging performed during the study period was also evaluated for VTE. RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of incidental VTE was 9% (n = 10) with 58% percent of VTEs diagnosed by screening US. Incidence of VTE in the randomized phase of the trial was 16% (n = 16) with 21% (n = 10) of patients in the control arm and 12% (n = 6) of patients in the dalteparin arm developing VTE, a non-significant 9% absolute risk reduction (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89). Sixty-nine percent of these patients were asymptomatic with 31% of patients diagnosed by screening US. CONCLUSIONS: Adding screening US to routine oncologic surveillance CT in high-risk ambulatory cancer patients with a Khorana score ≥3 can lead to increased VTE detection, with potential for decreased morbidity, mortality, and health care spending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loftus et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Asymptomatic high-risk cancer (n=117). Dalteparin prophylaxis vs. Observation was evaluated on Incidence of VTE (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89). Dalteparin prophylaxis compared to observation resulted in a non-significant reduction in VTE incidence among high-risk cancer patients (12% vs 21%; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: