Key result
Sound touch elastography effectively differentiated diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroids in children with an AUC of 0.945, but could not reliably distinguish between Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Why the study?
Does sound touch elastography (STE) differentiate diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroid in children?
Cross-Sectional (n=92)
No
Does sound touch elastography (STE) differentiate diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroid in children?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.945
p-value: p=<0.001
Sound touch elastography can effectively differentiate diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroids in children, though it lacks specificity for distinguishing between Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
STE may support differentiation of pediatric diffuse thyroid disease from normal on ultrasound; leaves open its role in distinguishing Graves' from Hashimoto's.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of sound touch elastography (STE) in conjunction with conventional ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of diffuse thyroid disease (DTD) and normal thyroid in children. Methods: Studies performed on 62 children with DTD and 30 normal volunteers were reviewed. Standard gray scale ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound and STE of the examinees, and the serum test results of children with DTD were collected, analyzed and compared. Results: The STE-Mean values in the Graves' disease (GD) group, Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) group, and normal control group, respectively, were 19.35 ± 5.00 kPa, 19.43 ± 6.06 kPa, and 11.24 ± 1.99 kPa. With an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.945, STE-Mean values differentiated DTD from normal children. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the superior thyroid artery separated DTD from normal children and AUC from children with GD and HT, respectively, and was 0.992 and 0.864. The PSV of superior thyroid artery revealed a somewhat favorable connection with FT3 and FT4. Conclusion: The STE results revealed that thyroid stiffness was higher in children with DTD than in normal children, but further differentiation into GD and HT subgroups lacked specificity, and the superior thyroid artery flow velocity might be a good supplement to distinguish both.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Diffuse thyroid disease (n=92). Sound touch elastography vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Differentiation of diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroid using STE-Mean values (AUC 0.945, p=<0.001). Sound touch elastography effectively differentiated diffuse thyroid disease from normal thyroids in children with an AUC of 0.945, but could not reliably distinguish between Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: