Key result
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm was discussed regarding the role of age, but no quantitative results were reported in this abstract.
Why the study?
Does EVAR improve surgical mortality and morbidity in older and younger patients with AAA compared to open procedure?
Does EVAR improve surgical mortality and morbidity in older and younger patients with AAA compared to open procedure?
This editorial highlights the critical role of age in determining patient selection and outcomes for endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
ge is a factor to be considered in any minimally invasive new surgical procedure like endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). There is a growing policy of using less invasive procedures looking for rapid recovery, less blood transfusion, less surgical trauma, less morbidity and less mortality. The two major questions that need to be answered when we are faced with endovascular treatment of aneurysms (AAA) are: 1. Can we offer surgical treatment to older patients, otherwise not candidates for surgery, with low surgical mortality and morbidity?; 2. Are the results equivalent to those obtained with the open procedure, so we can offer EVAR even to younger patients? Those questions are issued in the paper “Is age a determinant factor in EVAR as a predictor of outcomes or in the selection procedure? Our experience”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murad et al. (2016) conducted an editorial in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA). Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs. Open procedure was evaluated. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm was discussed regarding the role of age, but no quantitative results were reported in this abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: