Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is argued that the usual account of the discovery and subsequent rejection, or criticism, of Ohm's law is both a misleading and an inadequate explanation. A close logical examination of Ohm's experimental work reveals a conceptual structure quite different from that of the electrical science of his time. As a result of this analysis, it is claimed that the conceptual shift in Ohm's experimental work was the basis for the reaction of his contemporaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morton L. Schagrin (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: