Key result
Larger neck circumference is linked to higher cardiometabolic syndrome prevalence.
Why the study?
Due to cultural inhibitions making waist, hip, or thigh circumference measurements cumbersome in females, neck circumference could be an acceptable alternative for screening cardiometabolic risk factors.
Does neck circumference correlate with the presence of cardiometabolic syndrome in adult outpatients?
Cross-Sectional (n=201)
No
Does neck circumference correlate with the presence of cardiometabolic syndrome in adult outpatients?
p-value: p=<0.001
Neck circumference is significantly correlated with cardiometabolic syndrome and may serve as a simple, time-saving screening measure.
May support neck circumference as a simple outpatient screen; leaves open its added value in prospective cardiometabolic risk models.
Background: Anthropometric measures have been used for screening patients for cardiovascular abnormalities and metabolic syndrome since many years. There are numerous methods to assessing overweight and obesity, such as measurements of weight, height, waist circumference, hip circumference and calculation of waist hip ratio and BMI. Due to cultural inhibitions measurement of hip, thigh or waist circumference is cumbersome in females, neck circumference could be an acceptable option for such patients.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients attending the outpatient department in Yenepoya medical college Hospital between the period of May 2017 to May 2018. Total 201 patients chosen randomly in which 145 males and 56 females, fulfilling criteria of age >20 years were included. Pregnant females, patients with thyroid disorders, history of previous neck surgery were excluded.Results: Out of the 201 population studied, Cardio metabolic syndrome was present in 94 participants according to criteria of NCEP ATP III. In our study there is a significant correlation between neck circumference and metabolic syndrome (p value <0.001).Conclusions: Patients with Neck Circumference (NC) >37 cm in males and >34 cm in females are more prone for having cardio metabolic risk factors than patients with NC <37 cm in males and <34 cm in females. NC may be used as a simple and time saving screening measure to identify cardio metabolic risk factors in patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bendigeri et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk factors (n=201). Neck circumference >37 cm in males and >34 cm in females vs. Neck circumference <37 cm in males and <34 cm in females was evaluated on Presence of cardiometabolic syndrome (p=<0.001). Neck circumference greater than 37 cm in males and 34 cm in females was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of cardiometabolic syndrome (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: